R&D02PA11 Elastomer
PROJECT 02
Formulation Under Development

Bio-based Polyamide 11 Elastomer

PA11 Elastomer

PEBAX Replacement — Renewable Feedstock, Comparable Performance

The PA11 Elastomer project uses bio-based (castor-oil) PA11 as the backbone, addressing PEBAX's limitations in renewable feedstock supply and carbon footprint, targeting high-end footwear applications requiring sustainable high-performance materials.

Target Application
High-Performance Athletic Footwear Outsole (PEBAX Replacement)
Positioning
Bio-based PA11 high-performance elastomer targeting PEBAX-series lightweight and rebound advantages, with renewable feedstock to reduce carbon footprint.
Chemistry
Polyamide 11 (castor-oil derived) + elastomer compounding modification

Property

Full KPI Set

Includes the 3 confirmed headline metrics + other advanced metrics. Status column indicates confidence source for each data point.

PropertyValueStatusNote
Base ResinPA11 (bio-based)StructuralCastor-oil source; cradle-to-gate carbon significantly lower than fossil PA12
Target Density< 1.05g/cm³Pending · Awaiting ValidationTargeting PEBAX 1.05 typical value
Target HardnessTBDShore APending · Awaiting ValidationUnder formulation tuning
Target Rebound≥ 70%Pending · Awaiting ValidationTargeting PEBAX 70-75% typical value
Carbon FootprintTBDPending · Awaiting ValidationExpected below fossil PEBAX (~8.0); on par with Pebax Rnew® bio (~2.5)

Design Advantages

Material Design Advantages

Key levers from chemical structure to processing characteristics

01

Stable Renewable Feedstock

Castor bean has short growth cycles, no food competition, decoupled from fossil supply chains.

02

PEBAX-Grade Performance

Targets alignment with PEBAX rebound and density characteristics, providing equivalent athletic performance for high-end footwear.

03

EU DPP / Brand Carbon Commitment Friendly

Bio-attributed feedstock supports brand-level 2030 carbon commitments and EU DPP disclosure requirements.

Benchmarks

Benchmark Against Mainstream Materials

Specific gaps versus TPU and PEBAX

vs TPU
Industry mainstream
  • Expected rebound +15-20% (target ≥70% vs TPU ~55%)
  • Density similar (target <1.05 vs TPU 1.20)
  • Cost expected higher than TPU, within PEBAX economic range
vs PEBAX
High-performance tier
  • Renewable feedstock carbon advantage (PA11 bio-based vs fossil PEBAX)
  • Decoupling from fossil supply chain, avoiding occasional PEBAX material shortages
  • Performance aligned with PEBAX 70-75% rebound range

Current Status

Delivery & Next Steps

Current production status and client upgrade path

Next Steps
  1. 1Formulation screening (hardness / rebound / flowability triangle)
  2. 2Lab-scale datasheet (density / hardness / rebound / MFI)
  3. 3PEBAX benchmark sample comparison
  4. 4Internal LCA and bio-based content verification process

Confidential Notice:INTERNAL — Formulation details and raw material suppliers not for external disclosure.

Interested in PA11 Elastomer?

Whether datasheet requests, trial discussions, or formulation partnerships — feel free to contact us directly.