HyperTac GSRA
HyperTac GSRA
Abrasion × Slip Resistance — Generational TPU Breakthrough, No More Trade-off
The HyperTac (62A flagship + 70AT high-end transparent backup) breaks the historical 'good abrasion = poor slip resistance' trade-off, simultaneously achieving 25 mm³ abrasion and SATRA TM144 1.35 DRY slip resistance — two extreme metrics with no compromise, combined with injection-molding design freedom and 100% thermoplastic recycling loop.
Headline Metrics
Confirmed Core Numbers
Key metrics verified through laboratory or internal LCA, serving as benchmark for client comparison.
62A flagship translucent, 70AT secondary full-transparent (high-end transparent backup)
Benchmarked vs industry 62A soft TPU standard, equivalent drop-in
Benchmarked vs incumbent soft TPU standard
Property
Full KPI Set
Includes the 3 confirmed headline metrics + other advanced metrics. Status column indicates confidence source for each data point.
| Property | Value | Status | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness (Shore A) | 62A 級(實測 ~63A) / 70AT (68A) | Confirmed | 62A flagship translucent, 70AT secondary full-transparent (high-end transparent backup) |
| Density | ~1.19g/cm³ | Confirmed | Benchmarked vs industry 62A soft TPU standard, equivalent drop-in |
| Tensile Strength | ~22MPa | Confirmed | Benchmarked vs incumbent soft TPU standard |
| Tear Strength | ~71N/mm | Confirmed | Best in class (vs GCPU 53.4 = +33%) |
| Abrasion (DIN) | ~25mm³ | Confirmed | On par with industry 62A soft TPU; vs rubber 50-90 mm³ = 2-3x better |
| Slip Resistance (SATRA TM144 DRY) | 1.35★ (6 材料 TDS 同類最佳) | Confirmed | vs GCPU 0.8 = +69% |
| Transparency | 半透明 / 全透明 | Confirmed | 62A translucent / 70AT full transparent |
| Injection Cycle | 100-130s/外底 | Confirmed | vs rubber cure 360-480s = 3-4x faster; capable of 1mm thin walls |
Design Advantages
Material Design Advantages
Key levers from chemical structure to processing characteristics
Abrasion × Slip Resistance — Both Targets Achieved
Same pellet simultaneously achieves 25 mm³ abrasion and SATRA TM144 1.35 DRY slip resistance — two extreme metrics, no trade-off.
Drop-in Compatibility
Benchmarked against industry 62A soft TPU standard, with hardness / density / tensile / tear all matched. Existing molds, geometry, and designs work without re-engineering.
Full Injection Process Advantage
100-130s cycle time (vs rubber 360-480s = 3-4x faster), only runner cleanup needed before shipment, capable of 1mm thin-wall injection.
100% Recyclable + Design Freedom
Thermoplastic closed loop — runners, gates, and scrap all recycled. Supports brand 2030 circular commitments. Moccasin, pearlescent, and neon-transparent effects unachievable with thermoset rubber.
Benchmarks
Benchmark Against Mainstream Materials
Specific gaps versus TPU and PEBAX
- This is itself a TPU service — no vs TPU benchmark applicable
- vs PP+EVA economic option (Hyperlite): Hyperlite delivers -50% carbon / -22% weight, but lower rebound
- vs PEBAX (PA11 replacement target): TPU is cost-oriented; PEBAX is high-performance oriented
- HyperTac covers sub-95 Shore A applications; PEBAX / PA11 cover 95+ Shore A high-end applications
Current Status
Delivery & Next Steps
Current production status and client upgrade path
- 1Continue production order intake
- 2Maintain technical alignment with R&D Hyperlite / PA11 projects (client upgrade path)
Confidential Notice:Public service page. Detailed process parameters per client NDA agreement.
Interested in HyperTac GSRA?
Whether datasheet requests, trial discussions, or formulation partnerships — feel free to contact us directly.